Simply put, the "healthy smoking" arena now only offers basic guidelines and info on the health risk of smoking when using these novelty products. Here, its description as a "novel" product represents no real judgment at this time.
However, one must consider that research results normally require YEARS to tally and trace patterns thereof. Traditionally, cigarettes occupy a primary place in their employment and usage for diversion, relaxation, recreational sport, and even as a temporary stress release mechanism.
Ironically, many people actually DIE from the by-product toxins produced when tobacco is burned and passed through the chest, lungs, heart, and associated vessel. Essentially, pure air goes through an intentional contamination process, only to be exhaled without significant benefit to all concerned.
Consider second-hand-smoke, for example, which is a circumstance that occurs to a passer-by or unintentional recipient who merely happens to be residing near a person who chooses to ignore the health risk of smoking. This simple complication, and surprisingly, the much more serious ones, like the onset of lung cancer, for example, happens to be a fairly easily preventable occurrence.
Surely, no one truly needs to DIE because of it. Although the list of complications from smoking traditional cigarettes includes possible heart attack, lung cancer and other types including the mouth and throat, plus infection of pancreas, and the destruction of arterial and venous pathways... twentieth-century deaths arising from regular smoking habits top the 100 million mark, according to World Health Organization statistics.
One has to wonder, even if there were a cure or some new form of assistance available to the public that would brighten the picture, curtail the health risk of smoking, help save lives, and even positively impact the way that human beings receive enjoyment from cigarettes... could, should, or would we take advantage of such proposed alternatives?